Page 102 - 3rdPub1
P. 102

The Blaker Society ©    Cuckfield,  Nuthurst  parish  lay  in  a  different  hundred  (Singlecross)  and  rape
                                                     NUTHURST



                       Nuthurst is  five  miles west of Cuckfield. Despite  its proximity to


               (Bramber), and  in a different ecclesiastical jurisdiction   —   Chichester


               of such registers, in 1538, in contrast to many of the surrounding parishes.
                                                    1
                       The township of Nuthurst  is recorded in the 1327 lay subsidy returns :
                 archdeaconry. Nuthurst parish registers survive from the time of the institution
                                                                                                        2
               19 people were assessed for  tax, at amounts  for  8d to 3s 6¾d, as part of
                                    3
               Steyning hundred.  There is no Blaker listed, although there is a Robto Blachol
               at 2s and Willo ate Blakestrod at 10¼d.  In the 1332 return  for Steyning
               hundred, Nuthurst does not appear as such, but some of the same inhabitants
                                                                          5
               appear  under ‘Villat de Cherleton & Shrottesfeld’ . Similarly, Nuthurst seems
                       4
               to have been included in the ‘Villata de  Cherleton’’ in Steyning  hundred of
                                                              6
               Bramber rape in the 1379 poll tax returns.

                                                   Richard Blaker

                       Neither Nuthurst nor Singlecross hundred is  mentioned as such  in the
               1524 and 1525 lay subsidy rolls for Bramber rape , and as the returns are intact,
                                                                        7
               taxpayers from Nuthurst must be included under some other heading. Looking
               at the Chichester Consistory probate indexes, we find, for instance, a William
                                                                                       8
               Brussher, carpenter, of Nuthurst, with a will proved in 1553.   Brussher is an
               unusual surname, and in the 1524 returns for West Grinstead, in West Grinstead
               hundred, there is a ‘Wyllyam Brussher’ assessed at £3 6s 8d.  This is towards
                                                                                      9
               the end of the West Grinstead return; five entries earlier is a ‘Thomas a Dene of
               Rouspar’. Rusper is another parish later included in Singlecross hundred. Above
               this is:

               Rychard Blakyer       10                    [£]3

               There  is  no will or administration  for this Richard  in  the Chichester archives
                                                                                               11
               (Lewes start generally too late) or the Prerogative Court of Canterbury.

               1  Villat’ de Nothurst
               2  Sussex Record Society x
               3  There is no mention of ‘Singlecross hundred’ as such in the 14th-century lay subsidy returns or the poll tax.
               4  p. 270
               5  names that have since disappeared
               6   PRO  E 179/189/25. British Academy,  The Poll Taxes  of 1377, 1379 and 1381. Part 2. Lincolnshire-
               Westmorland. Edited by Carolyn C. Fenwick, 2001, Oxford, 589. These entries occur that might be abbreviated
               or misread forms of Blaker:
               588a Johanna Blake, Warnham
               590a Johanna Blake, Coombes, servant
               592e Robert Blake, West Grinstead
               7  PRO E 179/189/126 and /134, Sussex Record Society lvi
               8  British Record Society xlix p. 56
               9  West Grinstead adjoins Nuthurst on the south
               10  with footnote: ? Clavyer. There is a rare surname Clovier in Sussex. We need to check this
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104